Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Brad Johnson v. Randall Bryant
as 12-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAD R. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL BRYANT, DORIS CUBITT, CPA, MALANE S. PIKE, Esq and others
Defendant:
HENRY D. MCMASTER
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., M.D., GREGORY J. BRANNON, M.D., CHIMERE COLLINS and others
John Dickson, Jr. v. Bonnie Jone
as 11-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BONNIE L. JONES, Honorable Judge, in her official & individual capacity, HONORABLE JUDGE BRYANT SUGG, in his official & individual capacity, JANE DOE, Honorable Special Justice, in her official & individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Franklin Reaves v. Robert Stetson
as 11-1461
Appellant:
DONALD N. REAVES
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, PHd And All Others Similarly Situated and VASTENA REAVES, And All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT STETSON, individually and in his official capacity as Fire Chief and Building Inspector for City of Mullins, DANNY GARDNER, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Employee, DENNIS FLOYD, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Employee and others
John Dickson, Jr. v. Bonnie Jone
as 10-2193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BONNIE L. JONES, Honorable Judge, in her official & individual capacity, HONORABLE JUDGE BRYANT SUGG, in his official & individual capacity, JANE DOE, Honorable Special Justice, in her official & individual capacity and others
Brenda Bryant v. City of Cayce
as 10-1682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CAYCE, M. L. BRAKEFIELD, South Carolina Cayce Police Officer, individually and as agent and employee of the City of Cayce, W. E. ACKERMAN, South Carolina Cayce Police Officer, individually and as agent and employee of the City of Cayce and others
Eugene Holmes v. Elaine Marshall
as 09-1101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE T. HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
ELAINE F. MARSHALL, NC Secretary of State, DEREK G. WILES, WAYNE GROOMS and others
Marty Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, In
as 08-2327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTY R. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC., ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCORPORATED AND AFFILLIATES, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
