Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Ronald Emrit v. National Security Agency
as 22-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Ronald Emrit v. CIA
as 22-1317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
as 22-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENCY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Satish Emrit v. Barbara Cegavske
as 17-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA CEGAVSKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEVADA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals
as 15-1944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeal
as 15-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
