Cases 41 - 50 of 175
Kevin Michael Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 18-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, NC
as 18-1104
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA, DARLENE SPIVEY, as Mayor, DAL WOOTEN, as former Town Council and others
Jo Spence v. County of Arlington, Virginia
as 18-1002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JO SPENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ARLINGTON VIRGINIA, POLICE CHIEF M. JAY FARR, SERGEANT KIM JONES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gary Jones v. Paul Graziano
as 17-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL GRAZIANO, MELISSA FRENTZ, ROBIN MACK and others
Defendant:
MARK FRANKLIN SCURTI and ROBERT COOPER
Richard Darrell Trigg v. Mary Katherine Jone
as 17-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DARRELL TRIGG
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY KATHERINE JONES, ERNEST HAROLD JONES, JERI MORRILL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 17-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDY CARTER, individually for damages for qui tam recovery, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Ronald Hayward v. Eric Brown
as 17-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD HAYWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC C. BROWN, Executive Director, SHARON LAND, Deputy Director, YVONNE ALEXANDER, Deputy Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.