Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Joseph Gilberti, Jr. v. The Pentagon
as 22-1854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH D. GILBERTI, JR., P.E. an Individual and Licensed Professional Engineer
Defendant / Appellee:
THE PENTAGON, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (FBI) and others
Ronald Emrit v. CIA
as 22-1354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, (CIA)
Ronald Emrit v. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
as 22-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, (CIA), DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, (DNI) and NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, (NSC)
Ronald Emrit v. CIA
as 22-1337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, DNI and NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, NSC
Ronald Emrit v. CIA
as 22-1317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Hamilton Brown v. Mike Pompeo
as 17-7257
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAMILTON BROWN, a/k/a Frederick Hamilton Banks, as "Next Friend" for the Estate of Allison Parker
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE POMPEO, Director of Central Intelligence, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
David Bach v. CIA
as 16-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID CHARLES BACH, a/k/a David Bach
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Asha Lane Gibson v. NSA
as 15-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHA LANE GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, FBI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
