Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Shane Tew v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1882
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANE MATTHEW TEW
Defendant / Appellee: HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY, WELLPATH, LLC, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Gregory Perry v. Michael Paris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1394
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY PERRY
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL PARIS, Regional Jail Facility Contractor of the same, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, and unknown officers, agents and employees of the same, ROGERS and others
Marcus Shankle v. US
as 15-6672
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCUS JAMAL SHANKLE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, JOHN PENDERGRASS, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Office, INVACARE CORPORATION and others
David Bardes v. John Magera We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. BARDES, individually as a taxpayer; and as next friend of his two minor children DAB and APB
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN M. MAGERA, individually and in his official capacity as State's Attorney for South Carolina Department of Social Services, SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, CHARLESTON COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA and others
David Bardes v. John Magera We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. BARDES, individually as a taxpayer; and as next friend of his two minor children, DAB and APB
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN M. MAGERA, individually and in his official capacity as State's Attorney for South Carolina Department of Social Services, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHARLESTON COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant - None: ODESSA WILLIAMS, individually and in her official capacity as Charleston County Department of Social Services Director

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?