Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Tati King v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
TATI ABU KING, TONI HEATH JOHNSON and BRIDGING THE GAP IN VIRGINIA
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, KELLY GEE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Virginia, JOHN O'BANNON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Elections for the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 23-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INCORPORATED, ENGAGE ARMAMENT LLC, ANDREW RAYMOND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Deanna Robinson v. US
as 23-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANNA ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Audrey Lessner v. US
as 23-1507
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE, OCERINE COOPER and others
Not Yet Classified:
AUDREY LESSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Connie Ford v. US
as 23-1508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONNIE FORD
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Laurie Reynolds v. US
as 23-1287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURIE REYNOLDS
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Latasha Woolridge v. US
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATASHA WOOLRIDGE
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Gerri Hood v. US
as 23-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERRI F. HOOD
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Barbara Mast v. US
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA MAST
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Teresa Goin v. US
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERESA GOIN
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
