Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Andrew Anderson v. State of North Carolina
as 24-1277
Plaintiff: ANDREW D. ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans
Defendant: THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY A. COOPER, III, an individual, and Governor of North Carolina and others
Rodney Pierce v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1095
Plaintiff: RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant: THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: ROY A. COOPER, III and JOSHUA STEIN
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff: DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant: MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
National Assoc. For Rational Sexual Offense Laws v. Joshua Stein
as 23-2040
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, NC RSOL, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA STEIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LORRIN FREEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SEAN BOONE and others
Valerie Arroyo v. Southwood Realty Company
as 22-1160
Plaintiff / Appellant: VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant / Appellee: SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, in its official capacity, DAN W. RATCHFORD, in his official and personal capacities, HERMAN RATCHFORD, JR., in his official and personal capacities and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?