Cases 101 - 110 of 868
Stephen Roberts v. Mark Engelke
as 22-6411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN LAMARCK ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ENGELKE, Director of Food Service of Virginia Department of Corrections, JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, Red Onion State Prison, SHANNON FULLER, Assistant Warden, Red Onion State Prison and others
Kevin Doherty v. Richard Ashby
as 22-6356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN DOHERTY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD B. ASHBY
Defendant:
BETH ARTHUR, ACDF Sheriff, JAMES HYMAN, COUNTY OF ARLINGTON VIRGINIA and others
James Barnett, Jr. v. Warden Brickhouse
as 22-6381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRICKHOUSE, JAMES S. VAUGHN, KATINA JORDAN and others
Winston Reed v. T. Smith
as 22-6552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WINSTON NAJEE REED
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT T. B. SMITH and J. CARICO, Unit Manager
Anthony Trappier v. B. Antonelli
as 22-6445
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY GENE TRAPPIER, a/k/a Anthony G. Trappier
Respondent:
WARDEN B. M. ANTONELLI
Matthew Griffin v. Hollar
as 22-6376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU HOLLAR, JOHN DOE, #19-20, MARILYN GAMEWELL and others
Jeremiah Farmer v. BOP Director
as 22-6365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, REGIONAL, WARDEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and others
Lester Lynch, Jr. v. Beth Cabell
as 22-6341
Petitioner / Appellant:
LESTER B. LYNCH, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
BETH CABELL
William Hemming v. B. Hawerd
as 22-6483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ALVA HEMMING
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. B. HAWERD, C.O. J. KISH, C.O. C. BENETTE and others
Albert Mills v. Lawrence Hogan
as 22-6421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, STEPHEN T. MOYER, Former Secretary, SECRETARY ROBERT L. GREEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
