Cases 161 - 170 of 736
US v. Terrance Smith
as 17-7190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRANCE SMITH, a/k/a Ty
Freddie Andaya v. J. McClaskey
as 17-7111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE ANDAYA, a/k/a Raymond Garcia
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE J. P. MCCLASKEY, DET. CITY OF CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE K. CHILDERS, DETECTIVE R. GONSALEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA, ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and CHIEF GUY SMITH
Tashawn Thorne v. Officer Wesley
as 17-7039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASHAWN QWANTREAL THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WESLEY, Piedmont Correctional Officer, OFFICER SHERWIN, Piedmont Regional Jail, OFFICER BOOKER, Piedmont Regional Jail Officer and others
Defendant:
MS. BOWEN, Mental Health, MS. L. SMITH, Medical Nurse, MRS. SERGEANT TISDALE, Grievance Coordinator and others
Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
as 17-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK L. PERRY, BEVERLY STUBBS, R. N., DR. ARTHUR DAVIS and others
Brandon Michael Pickens v. Frank L. Perry
as 17-6993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK L. PERRY, ROBESON COUNTY, BRAD PERRITT and others
US v. Fredrick Smith
as 17-6976
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FREDERICK LAMAR SMITH, a/k/a Red Fred
Larry Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6972
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY WAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Christopher Michelson v. Van Duncan
as 17-6931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEE MICHELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VAN DUNCAN, STEPHEN COON, Asheville Police Detective, MARK S. GAGE, ATF Special Agent and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Miracle Smith
as 17-6790
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIRACLE SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.