Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Lloyd Roberts v. Richard Broadwell, III
as 15-7039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD O. BROADWELL, III and MARRY GOODMAN
US v. Wendell Lloyd, Jr.
as 15-6852
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WENDELL HUSSEY LLOYD, JR.
Adam Pelletier v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 15-6787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM PELLETIER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DON SHORT, was a Louisa County Prosecutor, JAMES LLOYD SNOOK, Lawyer-Charlottesville, VA and others
Annis Lloyd v. Lachlan MacNeish
as 15-6587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
LACHLAN MACNEISH, MARTIN J. ADAMS, KENNETH SARVIS and others
Defendant:
EDWARD J. MCMAHON, A. R. FALES, JR., G. D. JOHNSON and others
Kevin Harbin v. South Carolina DOC
as 15-6555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. HARBIN, a/k/a Kevin Habin
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MCBETH, ROBERT HUTTO, JOHN H. HART and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Director, JOHN H. CARMICHAEL, JR., Deputy Director and others
Granville Tribble, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 14-7725
Petitioner - Appellant:
GRANVILLE LLOYD TRIBBLE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and WARDEN OF GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Lloyd Sheppard v. Dean Mannor
as 14-7571
Petitioner - Appellant:
LLOYD WAYNE SHEPPARD
Respondent - Appellee:
DEAN MANNOR, Commonwealth's Attorney
US v. Lloyd William
as 14-7456
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LLOYD ANTHONIE WILLIAMS
US v. Lloyd Royal, III
as 13-7549
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LLOYD MACK ROYAL, III, a/k/a Blyss, a/k/a B, a/k/a Furious
US v. Lloyd William
as 13-6180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LLOYD ANTHONIE WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
