Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Elias Rodriguez v. David Leu
as 22-6682
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIAS JUNIOR RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID LEU
Jeovanny Rodriguez-Porras v. Demetrius Clark
as 22-6496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEOVANNY D. RODRIGUEZ-PORRAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, MS. WHITE, NURSE PIEARE and others
Defendant:
BERTIE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Vest
as 22-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
VEST, PA, FCI Beckley Medical, EDWARDS, DR, FCI Beckley Medical, FAIN, HSA FCI Beckley Medical and others
US v. Luis Muchado
as 17-7089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS CARLOS MUCHADO, a/k/a Francisco Javier Montesrein-Rodriguez, a/k/a Lois K, a/k/a Lex, a/k/a Luis Rodriguez
Osiel Rodriguez v. C. Ratledge
as 17-6301
Petitioner - Appellant:
OSIEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
C. RATLEDGE
US v. Martin Teran
as 17-6120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN TERAN, a/k/a El Chapin, a/k/a Daniel R. Rodriguez, a/k/a David L. Morales Garcia, a/k/a Hugo Roland Gomez
US v. Reymundo Rodriguez
as 16-7519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REYMUNDO MONGE RODRIGUEZ
US v. Constantino Rodriguez-Bailon
as 16-7459
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSTANTINO RODRIGUEZ-BAILON
US v. Milton Gonzalez
as 16-7031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MILTON ANTONIO GONZALEZ, a/k/a Milton Antonio Gonzalez-Rodriguez, a/k/a Peres Aguilarjose, a/k/a Jose Lopez
Michael Anderson v. T. Rodriguez
as 16-6887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOSEPH ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
T. RODRIGUEZ, Deputy/Loudoun County Deputy Sheriff
Defendant:
LOUDOUN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Employed Loudoun County Sheriff Deputies
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
