Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Joshua Paternoster-Cozart v. Bob McCabe
as 17-6189
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA PATERNOSTER-COZART
Respondent - Appellee:
BOB MCCABE, Acting Superintendent of Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Defendant:
HAMPTON CIRCUIT COURT, LINDA SMITH, Clerk, HAMPTON SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
William Hampton v. Federal Correctional Complex
as 17-6144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS HAMPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA, ERIC WILSON, Warden, MAURICE DANZEY, Associate Warden and others
Brian Hampton Watson v. Harold W. Clarke
as 17-6138
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN HAMPTON WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
US v. Michael Hampton
as 16-7734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. HAMPTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-7706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dmitry Pronin v. Lieutenant Troy Johnson
as 16-7562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DMITRY PRONIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT TROY JOHNSON, OFFICER FLOURNOY, OFFICER MIDDLEBROOK and others
Defendant:
SHU STAFF MEMBERS
Kenneth Newkirk v. General Assembly
as 16-7480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY, SUPREME COURT, TERRY MCAULIFFE, Governor and others
US v. Robert Taylor
as 16-6710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT HAMPTON TAYLOR
Kenneth Newkirk v. Artisha Gregg
as 16-6623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTISHA GREGG, Hampton Commonwealth of Virginia, MR. HUFF, Chief Judge, MR. DECKER, Judge and others
William Hampton v. Federal Correctional Complex
as 15-6890
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS HAMPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, MAURICE DANZEY, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.