Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Daniel Shannon v. Bernard McKie
as 12-6018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL SHANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD MCKIE, ASSOCIATE WARDEN JOYNER, MAJOR JACKSON and others
Scott Boger v. Gene Johnson
as 11-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT M. BOGER
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, JOHN JABE, JOHN GARMAN and others
James Tinsley II v. James Singleton
as 10-7309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. TINSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SINGLETON, Sheriff, Oconee County, GREG REED, Detective Oconee County, DAVID SMITH, Detective Oconee County and others
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Lappin et al
as 09-7957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HAROLD WATTS, B. A. BLEDSOE and others
Johnathan Smith v. Carrie Mayes
as 09-7307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN LEE SMITH, a/k/a Johnathan Lee X Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
CARRIE MAYES, Director of Nurses, V. S. GRAY, Operations Officer, MS. DABNEY, Mailroom Assistant and others
Ira Moore v. Mildred Rivera
as 09-6324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRA JEROME MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
MILDRED L. RIVERA, JOHN R. OWEN, A.W., STEVEN LABIER, Unit Manager and others
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-8228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Defendant - None:
AMERICAN AMENITIES INCORPORATED, Distributor of toothpaste and deoderant
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.