Cases 31 - 40 of 231
Webster Neumann v. Mr. Wedelle
as 22-7076
Petitioner / Appellant:
WEBSTER R. NEUMANN
Respondent / Appellee:
MR. WEDELLE, Superintendent and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Johnathan Ward v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6897
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN WENDELL WARD
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and BENJAMIN CARVER
Marty Gaston v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6851
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTY TARRELL GASTON
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Todd Collins v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6830
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD E. COLLINS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Somchai Noonsab v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dalton Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALTON ALONZO DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and STATE OF VIRGINIA
David Stephens v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6681
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID LYDELL STEPHENS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dalton Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALTON ALONZO DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and STATE OF VIRGINIA
Eddricco Brown-Bey v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6487
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDDRICCO LI'SHAUN BROWN-BEY, In Propria Persona Sui Juris Being restrained under the Ex Relatione: other
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MILTON OLIVER FLETCHER, Prosecutor, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS and others
Eddricco Brown-Bey v. Mecklenburg County Health Dept.
as 22-6477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDRICCO LI'SHAUN BROWN-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT-VITAL RECORDS, individual and official capacity and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES-VITAL RECORDS, individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
