Cases 71 - 80 of 220
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor, MELANIE A. SHEKITA and others
US v. Brian Rogers
as 15-7333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ROGERS
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Warden Richardson
as 15-7319
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN RICHARDSON
Roger Persinger, Jr. v. Northern Regional Jail
as 15-7284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER DALE PERSINGER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DALE GRIFFITH, Unit Manager (NCF), sued in individual capacity, JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner Division of Corrections, sued in individual capacity and others
Roger Persinger, Jr. v. Northern Regional Jail
as 15-7284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER DALE PERSINGER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHERN REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DALE GRIFFITH, Unit Manager (NCF), sued in individual capacity, JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner Division of Corrections, sued in individual capacity and others
Charles Gene Rogers v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7157
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES GENE ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Eric DePaola v. VDOC
as 15-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD CLARKE, W. P. ROGERS and others
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Diann Hood
as 15-7009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANN RATLEY HOOD, C/O BLOND and MR. SOLOMON
US v. Perry Shippy
as 15-6993
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PERRY ROGER SHIPPY
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Beverly Perdue
as 15-6963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY PERDUE, DR. KENNETH PRICE, JR., WARDEN BARNES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
