Cases 1 - 10 of 439
Lorence Smith, II v. Warden
as 24-6552
Petitioner:
LORENCE F. SMITH, II
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI Bennettsville
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Brandon Polk v. Stanly County
as 24-6361
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Defendant:
STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, STANLY COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, J. CRISCO, Sheriff and others
Matthew Budney v. Ronnie Huneycutt
as 24-6326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY, f/k/a Matthew R. Budney
Defendant:
RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT, Superintendent Warden at Avery Mitchell Correctional, BRIAN WATSON, Special Affairs Captain at Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Marcus Satterfield v. J. F. Seifert
as 24-6296
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JAMES F. SEIFERT, NOW DETECTIVE and ROXBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Marcus Satterfield v. J.F. Seifert
as 24-6279
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER J. F. SEIFERT, NOW DETECTIVE, ROXBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICER JAMES F. SEIFERT, NOW DETECTIVE
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6197
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, sued in individual capacity, J. R. MASSINGILL, sued in individual capacity, J. R. ADAMS and others
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6193
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, J. R. MASSINGILL, J. SHEPHERD, sued in their individual capacities and others
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Donald Ames
as 23-7291
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
DONALD F. AMES, Warden, JASON BRAGG, Unit Manager, RICHARD TONEY, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
