Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Izell Hair v. C. Parker
as 22-7172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IZELL DE'WAYNE HAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
C. PARKER, Lt. and MRS. LIVINGSTON, Cpt.
Walter Booker v. R. Timmon
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-6402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager, B. M. CLAUDE, Lieutenant, T. ROBINSON, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden and others
Momolu Sirleaf v. David Robinson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-7357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, ERIC L. PROSHA, JOHN KING and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, CURTIS WALL, M. VOSBURG and others
Momolu Sirleaf v. David Robinson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-7361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, VDOC, sued individually and in offical capacity, C. WALL, Prison Chaplin, GRCC, in offical and individual capacity, HAROLD CLARK, Director, VADOC, in his official and individual capacity and others
Walter Booker v. R. Timmon
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-7720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager, B. M. CLAUDE, Lieutenant, T. ROBINSON, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.