Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Randolph McDowell v. State of Maryland
as 24-6624
Respondent:
BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF MARYLAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH MCDOWELL
Randolph Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6280
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of D.O.C.
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
David Meyers v. Postmaster General
as 23-7118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
THE POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, CHIEF OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNIT, KRUSE and others
Jeremy Defour v. Lieutenant Webber
as 23-7010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WEBBER, OFFICER BEATY, a/k/a Officer Bates, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ROSSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, ELIZABETH KAY DILLON, U.S. Judge and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Alan Wilson
as 23-1372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, a/k/a Doctor Faltas, a/k/a Doctor Assa'ad-Faltas, MD, MPH
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, officially and individually, BYRON E. GIPSON, officially for prospective relief, GARY H. WATTS, officially for prospective relief and others
Randolph Ashford v. Broad River Correctional Institution
as 23-6250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDOLPH ASHFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
