Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Andrew Plummer v. Tim Riley
as 16-7303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW PLUMMER, an Inmate Incarcerated at the Tyger River Correctional Institution, SCDC No. 299191
Defendant - Appellant:
TIM RILEY, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of the Tyger River Correctional Institution, GERALD POTOKA, Individually and in his capacity as Chaplain of Kershaw Correctional Institution and ROBERTO ROBERTS, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Defendant:
MRS MIDDLEBROOKS, Mailroom, MS LECOMPT, IGC, BARRY TUCKER, Individually and as an Agent/Employee of Tyger River Correctional Institution and others
Andrew Plummer v. Tim Riley
as 16-6340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW PLUMMER, an Inmate Incarcerated at the Tyger River Correctional Institution, SCDC No. 299191
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of the Tyger River Correctional Institution
Defendant:
MRS MIDDLEBROOKS, Mailroom, MS LECOMPT, IGC, BARRY TUCKER, Individually and as an Agent/Employee of Tyger River Correctional Institution and others
Bernard McFadden v. Mr. Westley
as 14-7367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD MCFADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. WESTLEY, Officer of Kirkland's Law Library, CHRISTOPHER D. FLORIAN, SCDC Staff Attorney, DIANE HINGLE, SCDC State Classification Officer and others
Defendant:
MARGARET T. SULLIVAN, 3d Circuit Court Reporter, MARY WILLIAMS, SC Assistant Attorney General, CHARLES THOMAS BROOKS, III, Court Appointed PCR Attorney and others
Sam Davis, III v. State of North Carolina
as 09-7566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM FRANKLIN DAVIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT ERWING, Attorney at Law, INA WEINMAN, Prosecutor and others
Sam Davis, III v. State of North Carolina
as 08-6971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM FRANKLIN DAVIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT ERWING, Attorney for Plaintiff/Defendant, WEINMAN, Prosecutor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
