Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 22-7377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK REID
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, VA Dept. of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Daniel Jamison v. Stacey Kincaid
as 22-6438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. JAMISON
Defendant / Appellee:
STACEY A. KINCAID, Sheriff, MARK SITES, Chief Deputy of Operations, LISHAN KASSA, MD and others
Defendant:
XIN WANG, NP, Fairfax Couty Adult Detention Cener, DEPUTY PJ THOMPSON, #789, SGT. PUTMAN, #860 and others
Tessa Childress v. City of Charleston Police Dept
as 17-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TESSA R R G C CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress, filed as Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, LIEUTENANT CHITO T. WALKER, OFFICER SANDERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6162
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tessa Childress v. City of Charleston Police
as 15-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TESSA R R G C CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress, filed as Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, LIEUTENANT CHITO T. WALKER, OFFICER SANDERS and others
Lawrence Thompson v. Mary Carlisle
as 09-7863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY B. CARLISLE, d/b/a CEO Admin and KEITH DAVIS, d/b/a Security Off.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
