Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Scott Kent v. Mr. Kuplinski
as 16-6802
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT KENT
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. KUPLINSKI, Superintendent of VPRJ
Dennis Vandyke v. Patrick Bell
as 15-6954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VANDYKE, Saint Prophet Attorney with Law
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK BELL, DA Rutherford County Superior Court, WAYNE ABERNATHY, Judge Superior Court Rutherford County, KENT BROWN, Attorney and others
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Dennis Van Dyke v. Kent Brown
as 15-6807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Prophet Saint
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT W. BROWN, Former Attorney of Mine; et al
Dennis Van Dyke v. Wayne Abernathy
as 14-7842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE ABERNATHY, PATRICK BELL, KENT BROWN and others
US v. Kent Easton
as 14-7602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENT DOUGLAS EASTON, a/k/a "cdforfuninnc", a/k/a Keaston_1@yahoo.com
Kent Hovind v. William Anderson
as 14-7584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT E. HOVIND
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM G. ANDERSON, JOHN DOE, MR. DIAL and others
Dennis Van Dyke v. Lacey Thornburg
as 14-7099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
LACEY THORNBURG, FNU MCKELLER, KENT BROWN and others
Dennis Van Dyke v. Wayne Abernathy
as 14-6911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE ABERNATHY, KENT BROWN, DAVID J. ROGERS and others
Victor Glascoe v. H. Sower
as 13-7630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR GLASCOE
Defendant - Appellee:
H. KENT SOWERS, Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
