Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Octavious Elmore v. Mecklenburg County Courthouse
as 23-6953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OCTAVIOUS EDWARD ELMORE
Plaintiff:
S.J.I.
Defendant / Appellee:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Individual and Official Capacity, GARY MCFADDEN, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
James McNeill v. Monica Bond
as 23-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA BOND
Defendant:
CAMERON GADDY, NICOLAS BUSTILLOS, VIGO and others
Michael Hoiness v. Dr. Abdul Jalaludeen
as 23-6137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. HOINESS
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ABDUL JALALUDEEN, Physician, KATIE CARTWRIGHT, Physician's Assistant, J. DULEY, Registered Nurse and others
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., Health Care Provider
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
Mason Hyde-El v. Katie Poole
as 17-7063
Petitioner - Appellant:
MASON WHITE HYDE-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
KATIE POOLE
Alphonza Thomas, III v. Katy Poole
as 17-6930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KATY POOLE and ROY COOPER
Olander R. Bynum v. Katy Poole
as 17-6100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLANDER R. BYNUM
Defendant - Appellee:
KATY POOLE
Dwayne Demont Haizlip v. Katy Poole
as 16-6549
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWAYNE DEMONT HAIZLIP
Respondent - Appellee:
KATY POOLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
