Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Terrance Henderson v. J. Harmon
as 22-6029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE ROBERT HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. HARMON, Hearings Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center, CARL MANIS, Warden, Wallens State Prison and KAREN STAPLETON
Defendant:
W. R. HENSLEY, Hearings Officer, Wallens Ridge State Prison, DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, T. LEABOUGH and others
David Crawley v. George Hinkle
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-7511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE M. HINKLE, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, W. R. HENSLEY and others
Julian Rochester v. C. Harcuff
as 12-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
C. HARCUFF, Lieutenant, SERGEANT ATTWOOD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAYNE and others
Malcolm Muhammad v. C. Stapleton
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-6724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
C. STAPLETON, W. R. HENSLEY and RANDY MATHENA
Defendant:
M. STANFORD, B. RARIZEE, K. MASSEY and others
John Wilson v. W. Good
as 09-7757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
W. R. GOOD, JOE MOTT and JOHN F. O'NEILL CASTRO
Jose Bonilla v. Larry Huffman
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-7586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE D. BONILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, L. HAYDEN, Officer and W. R. HENSLEY, Hearing Officer
Joyner v. Combs
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-7481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BRIAN JOYNER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. C. COMBS, Major, MAJOR FLEMING, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.