Cases 11 - 20 of 269
Julia Kim v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.
as 23-1905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA KIM, DAVID SYDNEY, MARTIN NOVICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC., BRUCE J. SCHANZER, GREGG A. GONSALVES and others
US v. Zerrell Fuentes
as 23-6626
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ZERRELL ROSS FUENTES
Leonard Harris v. Nakita Ross
as 23-6433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAKITA ROSS, Parole Agent, CLEVELAND FRIDAY, Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Lian Ross v. VDOC
as 23-6379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIAN JOHNNY ROSS, a/k/a Lion J. Ross
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DR. DAYNA HAYNES, Clinical Director, MR. U. M. KILLBOURNE, Unit Manager A Building at River North and others
Nathaniel Moone v. Steve Herrick
as 22-7244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL HOWARD MOONE
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE HERRICK, Director of Health Services of the Virginia Department of Corrections, TREY FULLER, Content Owner of the Virginia Department of Corrections "Assistant Health Service Director", ROSS, Correctional Officer, Buckingham Corrections and others
FTC v. Kristy Ross
as 22-2078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
KRISTY ROSS, individually, and as officer of Innovative Marketing, Inc.
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Ricky Butler v. Warden Sullivan
as 22-7000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Jerad Ross v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-6700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERAD ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
