Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Keenan K. Cofield v. City of Baltimore
as 15-1263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DR. KEENAN KESTER COFIELD, Supreme GRAND Bishop
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, Maryland, Police Department, THE CITY BOARD OF ESTIMATES & ITS BOARD MEMBERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bruce Goldfarb v. Mayor and City Council of Balt
as 14-1825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE GOLDFARB and MICHAEL GALLAGHER
Plaintiff:
RUTH SHERRILL, ELIZABETH ARNOLD, MERAB RICE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, CITY OF BALTIMORE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CBAC GAMING, LLC and others
H. Laskey v. State of Maryland
as 14-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. LEIGHTON LASKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, CITY OF BALTIMORE, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, for the City of Baltimore and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dana West v. Susan Murphy
as 13-2014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA T. WEST, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ANTHONY HAIG, GARY SAUNDERS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC JONES, KEVIN ADAMS, TONIA BOWIE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN MURPHY, former Warden, Baltimore Central Booking and Intake Center, individually and in her official capacity and WILLIAM JEDNORSKI, former Warden, Baltimore Central Booking and Intake Center, individually and in his official capacity
Defendant:
CITY OF BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Baltimore Fire Officers Union v. Mayor and City Council
as 13-1115
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. CHERRY, JR., ROBERT J. SLEDGESKI, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
BALTIMORE FIRE OFFICERS UNION, LOCAL 964, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FIRE AND POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, a body politic and corporate, EDWARD J. GALLAGHER, in his capacity as Director, Department of Finance and THOMAS P. TANEYHILL, in his capacity as Executive Director, Fire and Police Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Robert Cherry, Jr. v. Mayor and City Council
as 13-1116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT F. CHERRY, JR., ROBERT J. SLEDGESKI, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
BALTIMORE FIRE OFFICERS UNION, LOCAL 964, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FIRE AND POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, a body politic and corporate, EDWARD J. GALLAGHER, in his capacity as Director, Department of Finance and THOMAS P. TANEYHILL, in his capacity as Executive Director, Fire and Police Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Robert Cherry, Jr. v. Mayor and City Council
as 13-1007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT F. CHERRY, JR., ROBERT J. SLEDGESKI, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
BALTIMORE FIRE OFFICERS UNION, LOCAL 964, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS
Defendant - Appellant:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FIRE AND POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE, a body politic and corporate, EDWARD J. GALLAGHER, in his capacity as Director, Department of Finance and THOMAS P. TANEYHILL, in his capacity as Executive Director, Fire and Police Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Movant:
BRIAN CHARLES VAETH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
