Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derek Jarvis v. Contractor Securitas Security
as 12-1242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CONTRACTOR SECURITAS SECURITY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, ISIAH LEGGETT and MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Derek Jarvis v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 11-2281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, ISIAH LEGGETT, MONTGOMERY COUNTRY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Derek Jarvis v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 11-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, ISIAH LEGGETT, MONTGOMERY COUNTRY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derek Jarvis v. Deborah Chasanow
as 11-1249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland, CHARLES B. DAY, Magistrate Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland, PETER J. MESSITTE, Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland and others
Derek Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Service
as 11-1214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDEX OFFICE & PRINT SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Derek Jarvis v. Staples, Incorporated
as 10-2299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAPLES, INCORPORATED
Derek Jarvis v. Grady Management, Incorporated
as 10-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS and SHIRLEY J. PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GRADY MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, DUFFIE, INCORPORATED, APRIL LANE JOINT VENURES and others
Derek Jarvis v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 10-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.