Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Supreme Ackbar v. Christopher Monaco
as 19-7498
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, BRYAN STIRLING, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, #275886
Kenneth Lucero v. Baltimore City Police
as 19-2072
Defendant:
WAYNE A. EARLY and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant / Appellant:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH LUCERO
Michael Collins v. State of South Carolina
as 19-7279
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY NIGHTINGALE, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JENNIFER LAIRD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER COLLINS
Robert Gerke v. David Call
as 19-6981
Defendant / Appellee:
S. GILBERTSON, Unit Manager of Building at Nottoway Correctional Center, J. BATSMAN, Major/Head of Security at Nottoway Correctional Center, K. SCHLOBOHM, Asst. Warden of Nottoway Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES GERKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rainbow School, Inc. v. Rainbow Early Education
as 17-1123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAINBOW SCHOOL, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
RAINBOW EARLY EDUCATION HOLDING LLC and REE SOUTHEAST, INC.
Rainbow School, Inc. v. Rainbow Early Education
as 17-1055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAINBOW SCHOOL, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
RAINBOW EARLY EDUCATION HOLDING LLC and REE SOUTHEAST, INC.
US v. Walter Early
as 16-4570
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WALTER LEE EARLY
Early A. Caudle v. Commissioner of Internal
as 16-1999
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARLY A. CAUDLE
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Kenneth Lucero v. Wayne Early
as 16-1767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH LUCERO
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE A. EARLY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE and BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
