Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Raymond Sims-Lewis v. James Willett
as 17-6437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. SIMS-LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. WILLETT, Superintendent, PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, Owner, DWIGHT C. JONES, Mayor and others
Raymond Sims-Lewis v. James Willett
as 17-6443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. SIMS-LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. WILLETT, Superintendent, PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, Owner and DWIGHT C. JONES, Mayor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schuyler Speece v. Pamunkey Regional Jail
as 15-8032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCHUYLER A. SPEECE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL
Raymond Sims-Lewis v. James Willett
as 15-7827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. SIMS-LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. WILLETT, Superintendent, PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, Owner and DWIGHT C. JONES, Mayor
Benjamin Shore v. James Willet
as 13-7266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN MICHAEL SHORE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. WILLET, Colonel, Superintendent, Pamunkey Regional Jail and CALVIN RAY LEONARD, Sworn In Officer, Pamunkey Regional Jail
Duran Horsford v. Pamunkey Regional Jail
as 12-7974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DURAN EUGENE HORSFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, M. N. WHITE, Major, Deputy Superintendant, Pamunkey Regional Jail, WEBEL, Captain, Internal Affairs, Pamunkey Regional Jail and others
Joseph Leaks v. Pamunkey Regional Jail
as 08-7826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LEAKS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, JOHN DOE, Captain of Security and JOHN DOE, Classification Officers
Roger Bancroft v. E. A. Awad
as 08-6406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER R. BANCROFT
Defendant - Appellee:
HUGH CASSADA, Caseworker, Powhatan Correctional Center, MS. HUGHES, Grievance Coordinator, Powhatan Correctional Center, W. P. ROGERS, Regional Ombudsman, Central, Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
