Cases 11 - 20 of 124
NC Division of Sons of Confederate Veterans v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
as 22-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, J. ERIC BOYETTE, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation of the State of North Carolina, NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
US v. Pedro Villalona-Torres
as 22-6028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO VILLALONA-TORRES, a/k/a Pretty Boy
Ana Torres Argueta v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1660
Petitioner:
ANA ROXANA TORRES ARGUETA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Erika Vasquez-Torres v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1594
Petitioner:
ERIKA SUSANA VASQUEZ-TORRES and G.V.J.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Silvano Dominguez-Torres
as 21-4205
Defendant / Appellant:
SILVANO DOMINGUEZ-TORRES, a/k/a Silvano Dominguez Torress
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jonathan Torres v. Nathan Ball
as 21-6447
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN BALL, Sergeant, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity, TIMOTHY R. TAYLOR, Deputy, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity and DANE R. ONDERDONK, Deputy, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANTHONY LEE TORRES
Carmen Bueso-Torres v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1246
Petitioner:
CARMEN LETICIA BUESO-TORRES
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, U.S. Attorney General
Coriante Pierce v. Lindsey Spain
as 21-6056
Defendant / Appellee:
SANTANA DEBERRY, ROBERT MCCASLIN, M.D., CLARENCE BIRKHEAD, Sheriff Durham County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORIANTE L. PIERCE
Ilda Torres-Nunes v. William Barr
as 20-2350
Petitioner:
J.F.M.T. and ILDA LETICIA TORRES-NUNES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
