Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,058
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff: ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant: REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
David Atkins, Jr. v. Doctor Shamar
as 24-6352
Plaintiff: DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant: DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor, NURSE STITH, RN, MS. OSEGHALE, Food Service Supervisor and others
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN MILLER
Abir Ali v. Esker Tatum
as 24-6527
Plaintiff: ABIR ALI
Defendant: ESKER TATUM, Warden and JOHN DOE
Shaun Love v. Larry Edmonds
as 24-6521
Petitioner: SHAUN MICHAEL LOVE
Respondent: WARDEN LARRY EDMONDS
Destined George v. Neeley
as 24-6524
Plaintiff: DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE
Defendant: SARGENT NEELEY, LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT FLEMING and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 24-6363
Plaintiff: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant: ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff: DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant: JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
Walker Washington, Jr. v. Warden Kelly
as 24-6514
Plaintiff: WALKER WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant: WARDEN KELLY, Individual Capacity, CAPTAIN CHASE, Individual Capacity, LIEUTENANT ALLEN, (S.E.S.) (S.I.S.), Individual Capacity and others
Telly Bristol v. Olinger
as 24-6322
Plaintiff: TELLY SAVALAS BRISTOL
Defendant: NURSE PRACTITIONER OLINGER, DR. HAYNES, Psych Senior, BATEMAN, Assistant Warden and others
Matthew Budney v. Ronnie Huneycutt
as 24-6326
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BUDNEY, f/k/a Matthew R. Budney
Defendant: RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT, Superintendent Warden at Avery Mitchell Correctional, BRIAN WATSON, Special Affairs Captain at Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?