Cases 31 - 40 of 119
Lamar Williams v. Michael Hanlon
as 19-6517
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CLAYTON HANLON, AUSA, HELEN DONOVAN, Social Worker, BRYAN K. FORMAN, Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR A. WILLIAMS
Kenneth Ashe v. J. Amburgey
as 19-6362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ASHE
Defendant / Appellee:
BCDC, J. THOMAS AMBURGEY, SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Megan Dunigan v. Brian Purkey
as 19-6236
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY MOORE, Deputy United States Marshal, PFC DON QUINN, Dog Handler, DEREK PATRICK, Deputy United States Marshal and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN EILEEN DUNIGAN
Randolph Kelly v. Helen Fahey
as 18-6246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH D. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN F. FAHEY, (Chair.) VA Parole Board, WENDY K. BROWN, (Mgr.) Court and Legal Services and SCOTT ROBERTS, Probation/Parole Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bernard Bagley v. David Dunlap
as 17-7379
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD BAGLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID DUNLAP, Warden
Respondent:
SC PAROLE BOARD and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES
John Robinson v. SC Dept PPPS
as 17-7027
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN C. ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES and WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Nekita White v. William Carreco
as 17-6953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEKITA ANTONIO WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM F. CARRECO, Probation Officer
Dawud Rahim v. SC Dept of Probation
as 17-6825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWUD RAHIM
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES
Reginald Garrison v. J. Ragucka
as 17-6257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD KEITH GARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. RAGUCKAS, Unit Manager, M. SMITH, Case Manager and RICHARD GRAYBILL, US Probation Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
