Cases 41 - 50 of 660
Lois Gibson v. State of Maryland
as 23-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOIS ANN GIBSON, MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH, FREDERICK, MARYLAND, CLASS REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23, AND/OR PUTATIVE CLASSES OF SIMILARLY SITUATED VOTERS OF MARYLAND AND/OR ELSEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF MARYLAND, and Several Agencies of the State, Including at least the State and County Boards of Elections in the Specific Counties Listed herein, A STATE AND NATIONAL RICO ENTERPRISE, IN PART LOCATED IN MARYLAND, AND/OR DOING BUSINESS AS PART OF THE COMMERCE IN MARYLAND WITH COUNTIES, I.E., FREDERICK, HOWARD COUNTY, CARROLL COUNTIES, MARYLAND AND 18 ADDITIONAL COUNTIES OR VOTING JURISDICTIONS, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE (CTCL), A Chicago IRS Code 501 (c) (3) Corporation and others
Michael Tullgren v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 23-1366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL TULLGREN, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. and THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. EMPLOYEES' CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN, whose names are currently unknown
Andre Hall v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 23-1357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE HALL, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the Capital One Financial Corporation Savings Plan and JERMAINE MINITEE, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the Capital One Financial Corporation Savings Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, THE BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION SAVINGS PLAN and others
Hilma Stover v. Bank of Missouri
as 23-1346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HILMA STOVER, on behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant / Appellant:
BANK OF MISSOURI, d/b/a Fortiva Retail Credit, ATLANTICUS SERVICES CORPORATION and FORTIVA FINANCIAL, LLC
Defendant:
FLUENT HOME, LLC
Hilma Stover v. Fluent Home, LLC
as 23-1345
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HILMA STOVER, on behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant / Appellant:
FLUENT HOME, LLC
Defendant:
BANK OF MISSOURI, d/b/a Fortiva Retail Credit, ATLANTICUS SERVICES CORPORATION and FORTIVA FINANCIAL, LLC
Nathaniel Nolan v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
as 23-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL J. NOLAN, Individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated and HELENA WITTENBERG, Individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Vickie McCree v. Walmart Inc.
as 23-1267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICKIE J. MCCREE, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Ariane L. McCree
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHESTER, WALMART INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. and others
Carol Taylor v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 23-1196
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL P. TAYLOR, Individually and As Personal Representative of the Estate of Damion Rashard Farmer and DARWIN O'SHEA FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND and BRANDON TYREE FOOKS
Tigress McDaniel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 23-1187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
In re: Michael Rufus
as 23-1195
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS, Individual and non-other person - see Dictionary Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
