Cases 41 - 50 of 83,027
Oscar Perez v. Ronnie Huneycutt
as 24-6645
Defendant:
DARREN DAVES, Green Unit Manager, ERIC DYE, Deputy Warden, RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT and others
Plaintiff:
OSCAR PEREZ
Kiril Zahariev v. North Island Baptist Church (NIBC)
as 24-1616
Defendant:
NORTH ISLAND BAPTIST CHURCH (NIBC)
Plaintiff:
KIRIL ZAHARIEV
Amy Bryant v. Joshua Stein
as 24-1617
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D., KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Alphonso Bell v. Brown
as 24-6703
Defendant:
CONTROL, Control Worker, BROWN, Lt. Deputy and GREEN, Deputy Sheriff
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO BELL, SR.
John Nelums v. Hutchens Law Firm
as 24-1678
Defendant:
ALAN M. STEWART, an individual, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, a S.C. professional association, JOHN S. KAY, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
DELMARSHI H. NELUMS and JOHN CALVIN NELUMS
US v. Reynaldo Calderon
as 24-6671
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REYNALDO CALDERON, a/k/a Ray
US v. Thomas Waters
as 24-6688
Defendant:
THOMAS BRADFORD WATERS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Frederick Clark, Jr. v. Jeff Vergakis
as 24-6636
Respondent:
JEFF VERGAKIS, Superintendent
Petitioner:
FREDERICK CLARK, JR.
Brenda Norman v. Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital
as 24-1690
Defendant:
ENCOMPASS HEALTH CORP. and ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA, LLC
Plaintiff:
BRENDA L. NORMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and COLLEEN BOCKMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1636
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
