Cases 51 - 60 of 244
Raymond Griffin v. Captain Steinbeck
as 19-6785
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN STEINBECK
Defendant:
SERGEANT SMITH, OFFICER LAMAR, OFFICER GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALAN GRIFFIN
US v. Salathiel Harrison
as 19-4389
Defendant / Appellant:
SALATHIEL D. HARRISON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anthony Harris v. City of Raleigh
as 19-6768
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF WAKE, DONNIE HARRISON and CITY OF RALEIGH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY HARRIS
US v. Salathiel Harrison
as 19-4375
Defendant / Appellant:
SALATHIEL D. HARRISON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Javob Harrison, Jr.
as 19-4254
Defendant / Appellant:
JAVOB JAMES HARRISON, JR., a/k/a Skittles
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raymond Griffin v. Lorrin Freeman
as 19-6490
Respondent / Appellee:
LORRIN FREEMAN and DONNIE HARRISON
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND GRIFFIN and RAYMOND ALAN GRIFFIN
Paul Seelig v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 19-6445
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. STREETER, MR. HARVEY, LIEUTENANT HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL E. SEELIG
US v. John Harrison
as 19-4180
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN HARRISON, a/k/a Binkie
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Smith v. County of Wake
as 19-6330
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF WAKE and DONNIE HARRISON, Sheriff
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated
Georgia Vocational v. US
as 19-1198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM and MICHAEL C. LEE
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through Honorable James N. Mattis, Secretary of Defense, Honorable Mark Thomas Esper, Secretary of the Army, and Contracting Officer (Attention: Rhoda C. Harrison-Spence) for Army Solicitation No. W911SF-18-R-0001
Undetermined:
SCOTT-GRACE MANAGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
