Cases 51 - 56 of 56
US v. Preston Roe
as 08-5077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PRESTON DARNELL ROE
Jane Doe v. South Carolina Department of S
as 08-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, by and through her guardians Gregory and Michelle Johnson, GREGORY JOHNSON, MICHELLE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SCDSS, DEBBY THOMPSON, ELIZABETH G. PATTERSON, Director and others
Defendant - None:
KAMERSON SETH COX, TITSA M. FLESCH, HEALTHY MINDS, LLC and others
Elaine Jones v. Calvert Hall Limited Partnersh
as 08-1492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELAINE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVERT HALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and MORT YADIN
Defendant - None:
LARENCE RICKY GODFREY, JR., JOHN DOE, Individual or Business Entity and RICHARD ROE, a purveyor or seller of the weapon in question that was used by defendant Godfrey in the shooting in question
Movant - None:
MICHAEL A. JACKSON, Sheriff
US v. Preston Roe
as 08-6475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTOINE M. WOOTEN
Movant - Appellant:
PRESTON DARNELL ROE
Waller v. City of Danville VA
as 07-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVIA WALLER, Administrator of the Estate of Rennie Edward Hunt, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DANVILLE, VIRGINIA, A municipal corporation
Defendant:
T. NEAL MORRIS, Chief of Police of the City of Danville, Virginia, in both his individual and official capacities, HUGH WYATT, in his individual and official capacity as City of Danville Police Officer, GERALD FORD, in his individual and official capacity as City of Danville Police Officer and others
Lee v. Clark
as 07-1702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CLARK, JOHN DOE, JR., RICHARD ROE, Officer, in their individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, DOUGLAS L. PATTERSON, BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
