Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 916
In re: Jamal Lewis
as 22-214
Petitioner: In re: JAMAL ANTWAN LEWIS, a/k/a Buck
In re: Raymond Perry
as 22-201
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND LEWIS PERRY
US v. Richard Lewis
as 22-4291
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD DEWAYNE LEWIS
Daniel Jamison v. Mark Amonette
as 22-6313
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL W. JAMISON
Defendant / Appellee: MARK AMONETTE, Virginia Department of Corrections Chief Medical Director and PAUL OHAI, Doctor, Dillwyn Correctional Center
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, NATARCHA GREGG, MSA, RD, State wide Dietitian for VADOC, DANA RATLIFFE, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional Center and others
Robert Lewis v. Hoke County
as 22-6171
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee: HOKE COUNTY, HUBERT PETERKIN, ABL FOOD SERVICE, a/k/a Summit Food Services, LLC and others
Tamar Harvey v. Frederick Russell
as 22-6077
Plaintiff / Appellant: TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee: FREDERICK RUSSELL, Asst. Warden
Defendant: D. LANDAUER, N.P., DR. ARAKAKY, DAVID A. RYLAK, MD of Augusta Health Center and others
US v. Christopher Tucker
as 22-4025
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER LEWIS TUCKER
US v. Christopher Tucker
as 22-4026
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER LEWIS TUCKER
Nagla Abdelhalim v. Andrew McDevitt
as 22-1035
Plaintiff / Appellee: NAGLA ABDELHALIM
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW MCDEVITT and ROXANA MCDEVITT
Defendant: AARON LEWIS, ARMISTEAD PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and DINARA LEWIS
Nagla Abdelhalim v. Aaron Lewis
as 21-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAGLA ABDELHALIM
Defendant / Appellee: AARON LEWIS, DINARA LEWIS, ANDREW MCDEVITT and others
Defendant: ARMISTEAD PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?