Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sutasinee Thana v. Board of License Commissioners
as 17-1192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUTASINEE THANA, MICHAEL JAMES LOHMAN and THAI SEAFOOD & GRILL, INCORPORATED, trading as Thai Palace & Thai Palace & Lounge
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF LICENSE COMMISSIONERS FOR CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND, PAMELA SMITH, Chair, GUY BLACK, Member and others
Sutasinee Thana v. Board of License Commissioner
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-1660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUTASINEE THANA, MICHAEL JAMES LOHMAN and THAI SEAFOOD & GRILL, INCORPORATED, trading as Thai Palace & Thai Palace & Lounge
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF LICENSE COMMISSIONERS FOR CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND, PAMELA SMITH, Chair, GUY BLACK, Member and others
Angelo K. Williams v. Eric Holder, Jr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-7440
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO KARON WILLIAMS, sui juris, Freeman
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., his official capacity as: Attorney General for United States, REX WAYNE COFFEY, In his official capacity as: Sheriff for Charles County Maryland, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, In his official capacity as: Attorney for United States Court and others
County Commissioners of Charle v. Panda-Brandywine, L.P.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-2238
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND
Defendant - Appellant:
PANDA-BRANDYWINE, L.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.