Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 24-6407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Defendant:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JONATHAN FRAME, AWS, ANDY MITCHELL and others
William Widmyer v. David Ballard
as 23-6940
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM TRAMPAS WIDMYER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID BALLARD
Jonathan Lind v. Ralph Terry
as 23-6329
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN JOSEPH LIND
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH TERRY, Superintendent
Respondent:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Jonathan Lind v. Ralph Terry
as 22-6432
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN JOSEPH LIND
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH TERRY, Superintendent
Respondent:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Keith Lowe v. Sherri Johnson
as 21-7443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH W.R. LOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. SHERRI JOHNSON, physician for Wexford, sued in her individual capacity, DAVID BALLARD, former Warden of Mount Olive Correctional Complex and JAMES RUBENSTEIN, former Commissioner of WVDOC, sued in his individual and official capacities
William Widmyer v. David Ballard
as 21-7378
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM TRAMPAS WIDMYER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID BALLARD
Ricky Pendleton v. David Ballard
as 21-6380
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY VINCENT PENDLETON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Mark Jeffrey v. Donnie Ames
as 20-7618
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Respondent:
RALPH TERRY, Acting Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK LYNN JEFFREY
Steven Adkins, Jr. v. Captain Toney
as 20-7516
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN TONEY, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN LEE ADKINS, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID BALLARD
Thomas Gardner, Jr. v. David Ballard
as 20-7514
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE GARDNER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
