Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alexander Acosta v. Local 689, ATU
as 17-1966
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
LOCAL 689, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Edward Hugler v. S&H Restaurant, Inc.
as 17-1091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor (Wage and Hour Division)
Defendant - Appellant:
S&H RESTAURANT, INC., d/b/a Aroma Indian Cuisine, MANDAL ENTERPRISES L.C, d/b/a Aroma Indian Cuisine, TEJAL RESTAURANT, INC., d/b/a Aroma Indian Cuisine and others
Ned Stevens Gutter Cleaning v. OSHA
as 17-1058
Petitioner - Appellant:
NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING & GENERAL CONTRACTING OF VIRGINIA, LLC, NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING & GENERAL CONTRACTING OF SOUTH CAROLINA, LLC, NED STEVENS GUTTER CLEANING & CONTRACTING OF MARYLAND, LLC and others
Respondent - Appellee:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
GMS Mine Repair & Maintenance v. Thomas E. Perez
as 16-2368
Petitioner - Appellant:
GMS MINE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE, INC.
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and SHAYNE BUNGARD
Pablo Gonzalez-Aviles v. Outside Unlimited, Inc.
as 16-2203
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PABLO GONZALEZ-AVILES and HELEODORO PENA-GONZALEZ, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PORTIA WU, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Defendant - Appellant:
OUTSIDE UNLIMITED, INC., AKEHURST LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC., A.R. STAR SERVICES, INC. and others
Pablo Gonzalez-Aviles v. R. Acosta
as 16-2203
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PABLO GONZALEZ-AVILES and HELEODORO PENA-GONZALEZ, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, EDWARD C. HUGLER, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor and others
Defendant / Appellant:
OUTSIDE UNLIMITED, INC., AKEHURST LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC., A.R. STAR SERVICES, INC. and others
Pablo Gonzalez-Aviles v. Thomas Perez
as 16-2007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PABLO GONZALEZ-AVILES and HELEODORO PENA-GONZALEZ, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PORTIA WU, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Defendant:
BOTANICA ENTERPRISES, INC., MOON NURSERIES, INC., MOON SITE MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Veronica Ogunsula v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 15-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERONICA W. OGUNSULA
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice (DOJ), JAMES BRIEN COMEY, JR., in his individual capacity as Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC, THOMAS E. PEREZ, individually and as former Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, DOJ and others
Veronica Ogunsula v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 15-1929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERONICA W. OGUNSULA
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice (DOJ), JAMES BRIEN COMEY, JR., in his individual capacity as Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC, THOMAS E. PEREZ, individually and as former Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, DOJ and others
William Smith v. Department of Labor
as 15-1713
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SMITH
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary, DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
