Cases 1 - 10 of 739
Silvia Hernandez Rivas v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1515
Petitioner:
SILVIA CAROLINA HERNANDEZ RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Walther Arriaza-Ramirez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1501
Petitioner:
WALTHER ARRIAZA-RAMIREZ, a/k/a Walter Alexy Arriaza-Ramirez
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Claudia Matute-Juarez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1505
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA ROSSANA MATUTE-JUAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Yamilet Garcia Chavez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1490
Petitioner:
YAMILET DEL CARMEN GARCIA CHAVEZ and G.D.B.G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Peter Terrelonge v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1472
Petitioner:
PETER HORACE TERRELONGE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jaime Martinez-Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1464
Petitioner:
JAIME MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Fausto Cruz Claros v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1446
Petitioner:
FAUSTO EULISES CRUZ CLAROS, SANDRA GUADALUPE AMAYA DE CRUZ, E.M.C.A. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Osman Amador Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1448
Petitioner:
OSMAN ELIAQUIN AMADOR HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Cesar Flores Nolasco v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner:
CESAR FLORES NOLASCO, a/k/a Cesar Youany Flores, a/k/a Cesar Flores, a/k/a Cesar Yovany Flores Nolasco
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff:
SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
