Cases 1 - 8 of 8
George Davis, III v. John Woodson
as 22-6543
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE W. DAVIS, III
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN A. WOODSON, Warden
Tamar Harvey v. Frederick Russell
as 22-6077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDERICK RUSSELL, Asst. Warden
Defendant:
D. LANDAUER, N.P., DR. ARAKAKY, DAVID A. RYLAK, MD of Augusta Health Center and others
Tamar Harvey v. D. Landauer
as 20-6849
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC BURCH, LEWIS, Augusta Correctional Center Officer, D. LANDAUER, N.P. and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. PLAUTZ, MD Augusta Otolaryngology Assoc., DR. DANIEL PETERS, University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology, AUGUSTA OTOLARYNGOLOGY ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Supreme King Allah v. John Woodson
as 20-6186
Defendant / Appellee:
T. HOSTETTER, Hearing Officer, JOHN A. WOODSON, Warden and B. J. LOKEY, Ex-Intel Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUPREME KING JUSTICE ALLAH
William Couch v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6526
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, HAROLD CLARKE, JOHN A. WOODSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM R. COUCH and SCOTT M. BOGER
Syron Rogers v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6276
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, DAVID MACDONALD, Primary Health Care Physician, Augusta County Correctional Center, FREDERICK SCHILLING, Director of Health Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYRON DEVON ROGERS
Douglas Fauconier v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS LEIGH FAUCONIER
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VADOC, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, JOHN A. WOODSON, Warden of A.C.C. and others
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, PRC
Hassan Shabazz v. John Woodson
as 15-7987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HASSAN SHABAZZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. WOODSON, Warden, GEORGE HINKLE, Former Regional Administrator and T. BACK, Unit Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
