Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Kenneth Barbour v. Governmental Imprisonment
as 11-6777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENTAL IMPRISONMENT FACILITIES, GOVERNMENTAL MENTAL FACILITIES WORK COMPENSATION FOR WARDS OF THEM, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Non-Ex Felon Voting Right
as 10-7733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
NON-EX FELON VOTING RIGHTS, LIVE ANIMAL DISPLAYS and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenneth Barbour v. Private Employers Using Prison
as 10-7653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
PRIVATE EMPLOYERS USING PRISONS AND MENTAL FACILITY WARD LABOR
Kenneth Barbour v. Religion et al
as 10-7605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
RELIGION, CULTS and CITIZENS
Kenneth Barbour v. Public Smoking Ordinance
as 10-7590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR, a/k/a Kent Barbour
Defendant - Appellee:
PUBLIC BUILDING NO SMOKING ORDINANCES & LAWS
Kenneth Barbour v. Taxe
as 10-7443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TAXES, VIRGINIA DEPT. OF CORR. OFFENDER TRUST SYSTEM, BRYAN WATSON and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Tracy Ray
as 10-7439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY RAY, GENE M. JOHNSON and PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE CAMERA'S - IOP 851 ROSP
Kenneth Barbour v. Tracy Ray
as 10-7438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY RAY, MARRIAGED, BRYAN WATSON and others
Kenneth Barbour v. United States Constitution
as 10-7382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR, a/k/a Kent Barbour
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
Kenneth Barbour v. Byron Watson
as 10-7378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
BYRON WATSON, GENE M. JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLEN, Former Governor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
