Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Daniel Cobble v. U S Government
as 19-6611
Defendant / Appellee:
U S GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U. S. MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Darrell Gist v. Franklin Olmo
as 19-6183
Defendant:
TAWFIQ ANSARI, Doctor, MRS. NOBLE, Physical Therapist, KENNY ATKINSON, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL F. GIST
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN OLMO, Doctor
Daniel Eric Cobble v. U.S. Government
as 18-6433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
U S GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KENNY ATKINSON and others
Calvin Wedington v. Unnamed Deputy U.S. Marshal
as 16-6746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL, KENNY ATKINSON, NURSE BEASLEY and others
Calvin S. Wedington v. Unnamed Deputy U.S. Marshal
as 16-6679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL, First, UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL, Second, LORETTA E. LYNCH and others
Mark Fowler v. Kenny Atkinson
as 16-6381
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK FOWLER
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNY ATKINSON
Respondent:
CRAIG APKER
Robert Visintine v. Kenny Atkinson
as 15-7905
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT STEVEN VISINTINE
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, FMC Butner
Anthony Bussie v. Kenny Atkinson
as 15-7228
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNY ATKINSON, DR. WALDON WEAVER and MR. GRIFFIN
Peter Bakowski v. Kenny Atkinson
as 15-6883
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER ANTHONY BAKOWSKI
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Federal Medical Center at Butner, NC
Victor Buencamino v. US
as 15-6839
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR J. BUENCAMINO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Butner - FMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
