Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Israel Veliz-Saenz v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner:
ISRAEL VALENTIN VELIZ-SAENZ, ANA RUBI LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, DALIA MARGARITA VELIZ-LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Pablo Lopez-Galvan
as 24-4147
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PABLO GONZALO LOPEZ-GALVAN
Mario Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1208
Petitioner:
MARIO RENE LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Flor Arriaza De Paredes v. Zen Nails Studio LLC
as 23-2309
Plaintiff:
FLOR I. ARRIAZA DE PAREDES and FRANCISCO HERNAN TEJADA LOPEZ
Defendant:
ZEN NAILS STUDIO LLC, PHONZ NGUYEN, a/k/a Dung Nen Chay Khach and LINH NGUYEN, a/k/a Nen Giu Khach Hai Long
Elvin Romero-Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2090
Petitioner:
ELVIN OMAR ROMERO-LOPEZ and ANGELA JOHANY ROMERO-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Alejandro Chavez-Lopez
as 23-6911
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO CHAVEZ-LOPEZ
Marvin Lopez-Reyes v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1834
Petitioner:
MARVIN DAVID LOPEZ-REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Estate of Joseph Lopez v. Matthew Hamilton
as 23-1832
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ, by Administrator Joe Lopez
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW HAMILTON, Greensboro Police Department Officer
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO
US v. Efrain Lopez-Perez
as 23-4469
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EFRAIN LOPEZ-PEREZ, a/k/a Hector Terronez-Gomez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
