Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Balraj Paul v. Kevin Plank
as 24-1144
Plaintiff: BALRAJ PAUL, derivatively on behalf of Under Armour, Inc., ANTHONY VISKOVICH, DALE OLIN and others
Defendant: KEVIN A. PLANK, BRAD DICKERSON, GEORGE W. BODENHEIMER and others
George McDermott v. Alan McCarthy
as 22-1642
Plaintiff: VINCENT S. SAMMONS
Intervenor: GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT
Defendant / Appellee: ALAN J. MCCARTHY, ALFRED C. WEIN, JR., JENNIFER R. LYALL and others
George McDermott v. Alan McCarthy
as 22-1405
Plaintiff: VINCENT S. SAMMONS
Intervenor: GEORGE EDWARD MCDERMOTT and GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT
Defendant / Appellee: ALAN J. MCCARTHY, ALFRED C. WEIN, JR., JENNIFER R. LYALL and others
Aberdeen City Council v. Under Armour, Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2032
Defendant / Appellee: MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, PNC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, BYRON K. ADAMS, JR. and others
Defendant: BRAD DICKERSON and ANTHONY W. DEERING
Plaintiff: MONROE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, BEN STENGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, BRIAN BREECE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, ABERDEEN CITY COUNCIL, as Administrating Authority for the North East Scotland Pension Fund and BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner: WILLIAM DENT, BERNARDO MEDELLIN, SACRAMENTO CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1573
Debtor - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1540
Debtor - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
George McDermott v. State of Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1335
Plaintiff: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, (JWG) Relator, Ex rel United States of America (USA)
Movant - Appellant: GEORGE EDWARD MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF VIRGINIA, (COA)C/O City Attorney James Bank,Their public servants,as individuals & in their official capacity as an officer of the Court, gov't employee,elected officials.Those listed below working as public servants for mentioned St/dept of USA, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, (COA)C/O City Attorney James Bank,Their public servants,as individuals & in their official capacity as an officer of the Court, gov't employee,elected officials.Those listed below working as public servants for mentioned St/dept of USA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (FBI)C/O James Comey,Their public servants,as individuals & in their official capacity as an officer of the Court, government employee,elected officials.Those listed below working as public servants for the mentioned state and others
Michael Tann v. Paul Grimm We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1658
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL EUGENE TANN
Defendant - Appellee: JUDGE PAUL W. GRIMM and KIM MCDERMOTT
Defendant: U.S. MARSHALL, (name unknown)
Judy Moon v. BWX Technologies, Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUDY L. MOON, individually and JUDY L. MOON, Executor of the Estate of Leslie W. Moon
Defendant - Appellee: BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY and others
Judy Moon v. BWX Technologies, Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUDY L. MOON, individually and JUDY L. MOON, Executor of the Estate of Leslie W. Moon
Defendant - Appellee: BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?