Cases 1 - 10 of 33
David Little, Jr. v. McLeod Health Cheraw
as 23-6918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MCLEOD HEALTH CHERAW, SOUTHERN HEALTH CARE PARTNERS, TYLER GOLDBACH, MD and others
Savannah McLeod v. Wow Pizza LLC
as 22-1496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAVANNAH MCLEOD, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons
Defendant / Appellee:
WOW PIZZA LLC and MICHAEL TINGEN
Defendant:
JUST A SLICE PIZZA LLC, d/b/a Domino's Pizza
US v. Jontez McLeod
as 22-4189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONTEZ XAVIER MCLEOD
Joshua Bower v. Jude Onuoha, M.D., C.D.
as 21-6566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA BOWER
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDE O. ONUOHA, FCI Bennettsville, SC, both individually and as employees of their respective employers and FOY D. CONNELL, MD McLeod Health Cheraw, both individually and as empoyees of their respective employers
Stephen Sanders v. McLeod Health
as 20-1812
Defendant / Appellee:
MCLEOD HEALTH, CLARENDON
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF CLARENDON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN E. SANDERS
Priscilla Everette-Oates v. Lolita Chapman
as 20-1093
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLEOD, Director, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity, NORTH CAROLINA STATE AUDITOR, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SBI AGENT LOLITA CHAPMAN, in her individual capacity, SHARON EDMUNDSON, in her individual capacity, BETH WOOD, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRISCILLA EVERETTE-OATES
Plaintiff:
DUARTHUR OATES
US v. Phillip McLeod
as 16-4210
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP BOYD MCLEOD
US v. George McLeod, III
as 15-6800
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GEORGE MCLEOD, III, a/k/a Pimp Stick Quezzy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
