Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. D.O.C. Commissioner
as 24-6028
Plaintiff:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant:
D.O.C. COMMISSIONER, ANNIE HARVEY, Commissioner and CLEVELAND FRIDAY
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Fredrick Abello
as 24-6003
Plaintiff:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN FREDRICK ABELLO, CHIEF OF SECURITY TYRELL WILSON and CORPORAL HUMPHREY ADUSEI
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Prince Talo
as 23-7283
Plaintiff:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant:
RN PRINCE TALO and DR. MULUGETA B. AKAL
Robert Moore v. Warden of W.C.I.
as 23-7263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF W.C.I. SHANE WEBER, NURSE TAMI OF W.C.I., DOCTOR OF W.C.I. JOHN DOE and others
Eloise Woods v. Equity Residential
as 23-2203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELOISE WOODS
Defendant / Appellee:
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL, EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC, SAMUEL ZELL and others
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Nicholas Enyioma
as 23-7051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS ENYIOMA, Captain, AMOS OGUNBIYI, Lieutentant and OMOLADE OYEKOYA, Correctional Officer
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Thomas Williams
as 23-7002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HEARING OFFICER THOMAS WILLIAMS and CORPORAL ADEWALE KASSIM
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Adebayo Adejumo
as 23-6981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. ADEBAYO ADEJUMO, ASSISTANT WARDEN NURUDEEN MATTI and CHIEF OF SECURITY MICHELLE MANN
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Baltimore City Police Department
as 23-6834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE CHRISTOPHER OTT, INVESTIGATOR KEITH SAVADAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
