Cases 1 - 10 of 21
John Butler v. USDC
as 22-6989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 17-6824
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 17-6483
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 15-7663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
Krystal Johnson v. Jesse Quattlebaum
as 15-2133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRYSTAL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE QUATTLEBAUM, in his individual and official capacities, TOWN OF SALUDA and HONORABLE ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 13-6568
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
US v. Emmett Quattlebaum
as 12-6240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMMETT QUATTLEBAUM
Steven Barnes v. E. Quattlebaum et al
as 09-8101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LEWIS BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
E. QUATTLEBAUM, Sergeant, individually and official capacity, MAJOR JACKSON, individually and official capacity and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kevin Smith v. Jon E. Ozmint
as 09-7540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. WARD, JAMES E. SLIGH, JR., JOHN LUNDEN and others
Defendant - None:
AEDEC INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, JOHN DOE, ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM and others
US v. Randy Quattlebaum
as 09-7460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY LINDIAL QUATTLEBAUM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
