Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Toney L. Arrington
Defendant:
City of Rocky Mount, James L. Knight, M. B. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Arrington v. The City of Rocky Mount et al
as 4:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Toney Lee Arrington
Defendant:
The City of Rocky Mount, B. C. Lawton, M. B. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connor v. Wake County et al
as 5:2012cv00701
Defendant:
Tavares Thompson, XYZ Corporation, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Raina Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peterson v. Midgett et al
as 2:2012cv00060
Defendant:
Rodney Midgett, John Douglas Doughtie, Dare County and others
Plaintiff:
James F Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fifield v. Creech et al
as 2:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Everette Harold Fifield, IV
Defendant:
Andrew Creech, Thomas Mears, Pamela James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunston v. Harrison et al
as 5:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
Eugene N Dunston
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Michael J. Hayes, Waco Douglas, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis v. Harrison, et al
as 5:2011cv00457
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , The City of Raleigh , Wake County and others
Plaintiff:
Lynwood Earl Artis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flythe v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dewayne Flythe
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Inc., Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Marty Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Town of Wrightsville Beach v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
as 7:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Town of Wrightsville Beach
Defendant:
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Town of Wrightsville Beach v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
as 7:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Town of Wrightsville Beach
Defendant:
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
