Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Emiabata et al v. Warren
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata and Sylvia Emiabata
Defendant:
David M. Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pickett v. Lance et al
as 5:2021ct03358
Plaintiff:
David M. Pickett
Defendant:
Dr. Lance and Nurse Grace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings, et al v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00198
Defendant:
Tamko Building Products
Plaintiff:
David M. Stallings and Courtney H. Stallings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 5:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
David M White
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harold v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2018ct03034
Plaintiff:
David M. Harold
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, John Does 1-100 and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Clinch et al
as 5:2018ct03005
Plaintiff:
Eddricco L. Brown
Defendant:
C. Clinch, J.L. Smith, T. Kistler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ecareer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2015mc00073
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Ecareer Holdings, Inc., Ecareer, Inc., Joseph J. Azzata and others
Receiver:
Viper Asset Management, LLC, Espo Consulting, LLC, DJC Consulting, LLC and others
Hudson City Savings Bank et al v. Mattis et al
as 5:2014cv00030
Defendant:
David M. Mattis and Margaret A. Mattis
Plaintiff:
Hudson City Savings Bank , Joshua R. Pinyan , Grady I. Ingle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00545
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
